<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is blocking HTML e-mail an answer?</title>
	<link>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/is-blocking-html-e-mail-an-answer-27.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 07:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: peter</title>
		<link>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/is-blocking-html-e-mail-an-answer-27.html#comment-112</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/is-blocking-html-e-mail-an-answer-27.html#comment-112</guid>
					<description>I am getting about 50 a day getting through all my various filters (which includes SpamAssassin at the server end and trainable clustering stuff at the client end). 98% of it is image spam. I guess some new rules for SpamAssassin might cover these..

I refuse to use RBLs as many are poorly run and not very discerning. As I have experienced (and blogged about), some jackasses will put you on their shitlists merely for bouncing back the crap they sent you, assuming it's spam that originated at your end. I guess an open proxy RBL or two might be good though..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am getting about 50 a day getting through all my various filters (which includes SpamAssassin at the server end and trainable clustering stuff at the client end). 98% of it is image spam. I guess some new rules for SpamAssassin might cover these..</p>
<p>I refuse to use RBLs as many are poorly run and not very discerning. As I have experienced (and blogged about), some jackasses will put you on their shitlists merely for bouncing back the crap they sent you, assuming it&#8217;s spam that originated at your end. I guess an open proxy RBL or two might be good though..
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Geoffrey McCaleb</title>
		<link>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/is-blocking-html-e-mail-an-answer-27.html#comment-111</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Dec 2006 23:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.petercooper.co.uk/is-blocking-html-e-mail-an-answer-27.html#comment-111</guid>
					<description>Hmm, do you not do a lot of online shopping? Ebay and Amazon spring to mind, I use both quite heavily (as with other etailers). Granted, as you said, whitelists could be created for those. 

Still, combo-plating SpamAssassin, ClamAV, as well as a good selection of RBL's on my server cut my spam rate by over 95%. Before my inbox resembled one of those virus honeypots (my addy is over a decade old). Now I barely get 1-2 a day. 

So why bother with such a draconian approach?

Geoffrey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, do you not do a lot of online shopping? Ebay and Amazon spring to mind, I use both quite heavily (as with other etailers). Granted, as you said, whitelists could be created for those. </p>
<p>Still, combo-plating SpamAssassin, ClamAV, as well as a good selection of RBL&#8217;s on my server cut my spam rate by over 95%. Before my inbox resembled one of those virus honeypots (my addy is over a decade old). Now I barely get 1-2 a day. </p>
<p>So why bother with such a draconian approach?</p>
<p>Geoffrey
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

